When Do You Qualify for Quantum Meruit Contract Claims Against the Federal Government?
Filing quantum meruit claims against the federal government can be confusing to businesses and individuals. Understanding what quantum meruit recovery damages are available to you under contract claims against the federal government is important. Quantum meruit claims recovery is available in limited circumstances.
Quantum Meruit Definition Per Contract Law:
Quantum Meruit in contract law, which means “as much as he is merited,” permits the contractor to be compensated under an implied-in-fact contract when the contractor confers a benefit to the government in the course of performing a government contract that is subsequently declared invalid. N.H. Flight Procurement, LLC v. United States (2014).
Even if the contract is not enforceable against the federal government, the contractor should still be paid for the goods and services rendered and accepted. This also applies to quantum meruit construction cases.
Quantum Meruit recovery claims may be available under the following situations:
- Government attempted to form a contract with a private party, but a defect prevented the contract from coming into existence
- There must be some contractual agreement between the parties
- Government refuses to pay
- Under the first two circumstances, even if there is no express contract, a contract can still be found if a meeting of the minds can be inferred under the quantum meruit theory
- Benefit by the contractor to the government in the form of goods or services, which has been accepted, but the contract was later rescinded for invalidity
- Authorized government agent
In Quantum Meruit contract law, some case-law requires a mutually attempted contract to allow for a contract claim under a quantum meruit recovery basis. N.H. Flight Procurement. However, if there is no contractual relationship with the federal government, then quantum meruit recovery, among others, is not available. See also information on cost escalation damages.
Quantum Meruit Contract Claims Recovery Not available when:
- There is no contractual relationship
- If there is no implied-in-fact contract, but rather an implied-in-law contract, the Court of Federal Claims does not have jurisdiction over contracts implied in law (28 USC 1491(a)(1))
- Claims forfeited under the Special Plea in Fraud Statute (Veridyne Corporation v. United States, 758 F.3d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 2014))
- When fraud is committed under the very contract upon which suit is brought (Little v. United States, 152 F. Supp. 84 (Ct. Cl. 1957))
- If the United States is a party to the contract, and the person who entered into the contract on behalf of the government had no authority to bind the government (See Council for Tribal Empl. Rights v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 231 (2013))
Quantum Meruit Recovery damages in Colorado: Similar to the federal contracting requirements, a plaintiff seeking to recover under a quantum meruit recovery theory (also termed unjust enrichment or quasi-contract) in Colorado must show that (1) at the plaintiff’s expense, (2) the defendant received a benefit, (3) under circumstances that would make it unjust for the defendant to keep the benefit without paying the plaintiff. Salzman v. Bachrach, 996 P.2d 1263 (Colo. 2000).
In a recent quantum meruit claims recovery case involving a government construction project in Colorado, United States ex rel. Heggem-Lundquist Paint Co. v. Centerre Government Contracting Group, a subcontractor sought quantum meruit recovery against another subcontractor.
The plaintiff was also trying to recover breach of contract. Even if the plaintiff cannot recover under both theories, Colorado law permits a party to advance multiple theories of recovery. Hemmann Mgmt. Servs. v. Mediacell, Inc., 176 P.3d 856 (Colo. App. 2007). Litigants must also understand the difference between quantum meruit vs unjust enrichment
At the minimum, under quantum meruit contract law, you may have a quantum meruit recovery claim against the federal government. Please call a contract claims and dispute lawyer at 1-866-601-5518.