LPTA & Lowest PriceTechnically Acceptable Source Selection Process
The lowest price technically acceptable source selection process (LPTA) is commonly used by government contracting agencies when best value is expected to result from selection of the
technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.
Many solicitations are now advertised as using the lowest cost technically acceptable source selection process. Agencies are using this method because they are somewhat difficult to challenge at the bid protest level. However, contracting agencies do make mistakes during source selection. A well thought-out bid protest analysis that is supported by facts in the record can lead to a winning protest.
- Although Agencies have broad discretion when reviewing source selection criteria to determine whether your proposal is technically acceptable, there are still reputable ways to challenge the award decision.
When it comes to challenging a lowest price technically acceptable source selection process at GAO the best way to challenge your competition’s award in a bid protest is to show that the Agency overlooked a material aspect of the awardee’s proposal but still allowed it to pass as technically acceptable.
- A commonly overlooked requirement can be embedded in contract clauses.
- The Performance Work Statement is not the only source of a material requirement.
Tips for Proactive Bidders: If the solicitation dictates that the award will be made by using a lowest cost technically acceptable source selection process, consider the following when developing your response to the solicitation:
- Make sure that your pricing proposal is low enough but more to create unusual risks: many government contractors overlook the impact of an LPTA evaluation.
- Although, you can provide the best possible technical proposal, many awards lose out simply because no real attention is paid to proposing the lowest possible price.
In the alternative, some bidders lose sight of the importance of a strong technical proposal. Detail is still important because even if your price is low, the agency will not even get to consider your price if your technical bid is unacceptable. See more information about government contract pricing.
- Keep in mind that you should get a post award debriefing within the required deadlines
- Simply attacking the awardee’s extremely low price will not get you the result you are looking for.
- Find out more about SBA Certificate of Competency rules.
No Trade-offs Allowed In Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection Process
The LPTA source selection process does not allow for trade-offs. As compared to a negotiated procurement under FAR 15, non-price factors are generally not rated.
- If you allege only best value and trade-off errors in your bid protest, the Agency will seek dismissal of your case.
- The strength in your protest should focus on the technical evaluation.
Limited Best Value Assessment is Allowed:
To say that the lowest cost technically acceptable source selection process completely disallows any type of best value analysis is not completely accurate. The agency should at least look at a lower-priced proposal to see if there are risks of the whether the offeror understands the solicitation requirements. See additional information about technical evaluation criteria.
Instead, the source selection panel, after making a determination that your proposal is acceptable may simply rush to the substantially low price and make the award without any further assessment of your understanding of the requirements.
- The real difference is in LPTA source evaluation criteria is that there is limited best value analysis. To say that there is no evaluation to make sure that the bidder understands the requirement should not be allowed by the courts.
Agencies should not be allowed to simply overlook an offeror’s questionable lower price and grant the award. This would raise a serious concern with spending taxpayer dollars and turning a blind eye to a situation where there is high risk of performance.
See more information about price reasonableness and source selection evaluation board decisions. Learn more about best value.
For more information or help with the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process challenges, call our bid protest lawyers at 1-866-601-5518.

20 comments on “LPTA & Lowest PriceTechnically Acceptable Source Selection Process”
[…] with the solicitation’s evaluation scheme, procurement statutes and regulations. As compared to a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable procurement, proposals with the same adjectival ratings are not necessarily of equal […]
[…] under the FAR is a highly contested issue. You have to avoid costly mistakes by assuming that the lowest price should get the award. The contracting agency has specific guidelines for evaluating price […]
[…] Without this, your response the RFP will be wasted. Look to see whether the procurement is simply a lowest price technically acceptable or a negotiated procurement under FAR 15. This will make a clear difference in how you read […]
[…] for bidders in a lowest price technical acceptable procurement; […]
[…] themselves despite the lack of documentation in a contemporaneous record. See information on lowest price technically acceptable […]
[…] the agency may think that you don’t understand the requirements of the RFP. See information on lowest price technically acceptable […]
[…] the source selection evaluation board decides that in the context of a lowest price technically acceptable evaluation scheme, a small business’ past performance evaluation is not acceptable, “the matter shall be […]
[…] to do, and such a proposal offer is not inherently improper on its face. See information on lowest price technically acceptable […]
[…] award of the contract to OFI effectively and unlawfully converted a best-value procurement into a lowest price technically acceptable […]
[…] competitive position improved due to a lack of relevant past performance, procurements evaluated as lowest price technically acceptable ( LPTA) does create a positive result for contractors with neutral past performance […]
[…] bidding is primarily used for firm-fixed price contracts, when the government is looking for the lowest price. Request for proposals (“RFPs”) often require more detailed information from the perspective […]
[…] file an lowest price technically acceptable GAO bid protest, it is important to understand that the LPTA process is to be used when the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically […]
[…] anticipates the use of a best value evaluation plan–as opposed to selection based on lowest price and technical acceptability–evaluation of quotations is not limited to determining whether a quotation is merely […]
[…] government is not required to go to a lower bidder unless the solicitation is a lowest price technically acceptable […]
[…] it would not be reasonable for the agency to publish a solicitation and go through the traditional source selection process. This would obviously put the agency’s mission at […]
[…] bids include lowest price technically acceptable and negotiated procurements. Negotiated procurements tend to focus on factors and sub factors […]
[…] government uses contracting by negotiation to procure its products or services, it uses various source selection processes and techniques to get its result. As a matter of practice, contracting agencies uses various […]
[…] Lowest price technically acceptable bidding: Government contract pricing for these types of bids pay very little attention to low price proposals. However, the key is to make sure that your technical proposal is acceptable. If it is not, then the source selection board will not get to the second step- your low price. […]
[…] in GAO’s protest decision that agrees with the agency’s evaluation decision. Protesting technically unacceptable proposal decisions in a GAO protest can be disappoint if contractors fail to apply the proper legal analysis […]
[…] litigants argued that the agency improperly converted the best value procurement to one that was lowest priced technically acceptable. The question that the bidders did not entirely overcome was whether the government has to award to […]
Comments are closed.