Does Indictment Mean Jail Time for Government Contractors?
Many government contractors ask the question, does indictment mean jail time. The answer is No, a federal indictment by a grand jury only starts the official process of determining whether you are guilty. A defendant may also resolve a case by pleading guilty and admitting to their crimes. But defendants who want to contest the charges can go to trial before a judge or a jury.
What Does an Indictment Mean for Federal Contractors?
An indictment can mean different things to government contractors. However, what stays the same is usually the process. During the initial investigation, the prosecution collects evidence – testimony and or documents to then decide whether or not to present this evidence before a grand jury. The question before a grand jury is whether the prosecution has presented sufficient evidence to formally charge the contractor (or other defendant) with a federal crime. The process of reviewing the evidence, some measure of deliberation, and a decision to formally charge the defendant is called “an indictment.”
A grand jury indictment is not a conviction. Instead, it is a formal accusation to the defendant. An indictment means that the defendant contractor has formal constitutional rights at the charging stage.
After the grand jury indictment is handed down, the prosecutor then has to prepare for trial. The general rule is that the indictment cannot be evidence to somehow translate into a guilty verdict.
During the federal indictment process, federal judges oversee the indictment process if requested by the prosecution. Interestingly, the judge is usually not present during a grand jury indictment hearing. The jurors are also permitted to ask the witness questions.
An indictment also means that the panel of jury members does not hear testimony from the defendant’s contractor or the defense’s side.
What is the next step after being indicted as a government contractor?
What rights do you have as a government contractor when formally indicted?
Constitutional Defense in Federal Fraud Cases – Usually Overlooked – Our Lawyers Protect Your Rights
When the government investigates fraud allegations—whether in government contracts, healthcare billing, or procurement fraud—they often push legal boundaries to build their case. Many defense attorneys focus only on the criminal or regulatory aspects of these charges. However, constitutional violations are often the key to dismantling the prosecution’s case, and this is where our firm stands apart.
Federal agencies frequently obtain evidence through search warrants, subpoenas, and surveillance, but these methods are not always legally sound. If investigators exceed the scope of a warrant, seize protected business records, or conduct unlawful searches and seizures, they may have violated your Fourth Amendment rights. Evidence obtained improperly can often be challenged and suppressed, significantly weakening the case against you.
Unlike other firms that only understand the criminal and regulatory aspects of fraud cases, our team includes constitutional lawyers who analyze every detail of how evidence was gathered. We scrutinize whether the government relied on unlawful wiretaps, forced statements, or overbroad document seizures—critical mistakes that could lead to case dismissals or reduced charges.
If you are being investigated or charged with fraud, do not assume the government followed the law in building its case. A single constitutional violation could change the outcome of your case. Contact our firm today to discuss how we can protect your rights and your future. Speak to Theodore Watson. Call 1.866.601.5518.