As a subcontractor to a federal government procurement, you may often find yourself wondering what is the privity of contract rule for federal government contracts and why the Contracting Officer, or even the Small Business Administration (in small business matters), does not intervene when you have a dispute with the prime contractor.
The general answer that you may hear from any Contracting Officer, and even the SBA, is that the government lacks privity with subcontractors.
What is Privity of Contract?
The privity of contract definition in government procurement is defined and met when there are direct contractual relationships between two parties. In government contracting, the owner and the prime contractor enter into a written agreement. This is generated from the solicitation and ultimate award of the contract. See relevant information about the Severin Doctrine.
Lack of Contract Privity Between the Government and Subcontractors
When problems arise with a government subcontractor, the subcontract governs the available remedies. Under the legal definition, there is a lack of contract privity between the government and subcontractors.The agency seldom has any leverage to resolve prime and subcontractor disputes due to no contract.
In government construction contracts, your contract with the prime should allow for the main contractor to address any of your concerns directly with the government. See United States v. Turner Constr. Co., 827 F.2d 1554, 1559-61 (Fed. Cir. 1987). As a prime contractor, damages against you from a subcontractor can be included in your damages claim against the Government. See Pan Arctic Corp. v. United States, 8 Cl. Ct. 546,548(1985).
Government Subcontractor Privity of Contract – Exception: There can be circumstances where the facts of your case allow you, as a government subcontractor, to bring a direct action against the Government. Privity of contract exception cases are very fact specific and should be reviewed by a government contracts attorney before moving forward.
As a subcontractor, you may overcome defenses such as lack of privity with the agency if you can show that there is an explicit or implicit contract with the Government. See Blair, 321 U.S. at 737; Balboa Ins. Co. v. United States, 775 F.2d 1158, 1160-61 (Fed. Cir. 1985); Putnam Mills Corp. v. United States, 479 F.2d 1334, 1337 (Cl. Ct. 1973) (“It is clear that, unless the plaintiff can provide evidence of the existence of some type of contract between it and the United States, it cannot, as a subcontractor, recover directly from the United States for amounts owed to it by the Prime.”).
Rule When There is a Subcontracting Plan Requirement? This is a common question yet to be answered by the courts. First, it is important to review the contract privity requirements under the FAR to see whether the SBA or the Contracting Officer has statutory authority to act when considering their authority in federal procurement.
- Next, it is important to determine what damages may be available for the contracting officer to enforce.
- It is also crucial to understand the role the SBA plays in carrying out the small business subcontracting program.
Material Breach of Contract in federal procurement: After a careful reading of the requirements, when a prime contract that is required to “comply” with the small business subcontracting plan requirement fails to act according to the terms, then the contracting officer can assess liquidated damages for material breach.
It would seem that under these government procurement statutes, the contracting officer does have the authority to act — statutory privity of contract definition.
When prime contractors fail to pay a government subcontractor, an argument can be made that the prime is failing (without valid reason) to comply with the contract. However, under the privity definition, the government generally will suggest that non-payment from primes to subcontractors is a matter between the prime and subcontractor.
There are other ways to address this problem in federal contracting. Contract privity here would create a statutory obligation for the both the Small Business Administration and the Contracting Officer to act.
For additional assistance, you may want to consult about what is privity of contract in government procurement laws, Contact a government contracts attorney at 1-866-601-5518 for a free initial consultation.