Contracting By Negotiation Process With the Federal Government
How Does Contracting By Negotiation With the Federal Government Impact Your Company?When the federal government uses contracting by negotiation to procure its products or services, it uses various source selection processes and techniques to get its result. As a matter of practice,
contracting agencies uses different competitive acquisition strategies and federal contract negotiation techniques for certain types of acquisitions. Companies still have to apply the difference between FAR part 15 vs. FAR part 12.
If businesses submit weak proposals, there is usually no room to negotiate. Alternatively, if companies submit strong technical proposals or proposals that provide better value to the government, the impact of contracting by negotiation puts your company in a better position to negotiate terms with the agency.
When using FAR 15 negotiation methods, federal contracting agencies solicit proposals from the public. After receipt of bids, the negotiation process allows for discussions, clarifications, revision of proposals and allows for the government also to negotiate pricing and other critical aspects that may lead to better value.
Best Value Source Selections
Under FAR 15.101 government contracting agencies seek to get the best value when contracting by negotiation. Depending on the type of acquisition, a bidder’s price could have a varying weight of relative importance. Each solicitation must have the requisite amount of importance so that offerors can write the proposal responses accordingly. An example of a contract by negotiation is where price is very important would be buying office furniture or supplies.
FAR 15 Varying Approaches and Federal Contract Negotiation Techniques
Sole Source Contracting: Most government contractors are familiar with sole source contracting as one of the federal contract negotiation techniques . When using this level of negotiated contracting techniques, the agency should strive to eliminate unnecessary technical hurdles typically seen in competitive acquisitions. There is less of a requirement for competition. Under FAR 15.002, when contracting in a sole source environment, the request for proposals (RFP) / solicitation is usually adjusted to get rid of unnecessary information and requirements; there are a simple evaluation criterion and less proposal preparation instructions. The government and the contractor focus more on getting specific values.
Government Contract Negotiation Process – Competitive Bidding: When contracting in a competitive environment, the bidding procedures are supposed to minimize the complexity of the bid, the evaluation, and the source selection decision, while maintaining a process designed to foster an impartial and comprehensive evaluation of offerors’ proposals, leading to selection of the proposal representing the best value to the Government. In opposition to sole source contracts, contracting by negotiation can be more frequently seen in competitive proposals. During the proposal evaluation process, your company may be allowed to present best and final offers (BAFO). This is but another way the the government contract negotiation process works.
Here the government focuses on emphasizing more stringent evaluation criteria and finding best value through the negotiated contracting process. Agencies rely on their source selection teams to apply the proper contract negotiation thresholds as stated in the solicitation.
Having a Better Grasp of Contracting by Negotiation Processes Allows for Better Bids: As a particle matter, most government contractors understand the basics of contract negotiation. However, successful companies that are doing business with the federal government have taken a more detailed step to understanding the process intimately
This allows them to develop better bidding strategies that lead to contract negotiation techniques by the government. It also helps companies to develop better technical proposal where the best value to the government is obvious. The only thing left is to negotiate more favorable terms with the agency.
Speak With a Lawyer. Get a Free Initial Consultation.
For additional help with the contracting by negotiation process, or writing better government proposals, call our attorneys and government contract consultants at 1-866-601-5518. FREE INITIAL CONSULTATION.

8 comments on “Contracting By Negotiation Process With the Federal Government”
[…] Best value RFP evaluations are among the most highly contested issue in bid protests. Many contractors find themselves challenging the Agencies choice but can improve their proposal writing strategies if they first understand the agency’s discretion to decide which RFP provides best value, and develop responses to RFP that focus on getting more strengths than weakness – proposals that help the government justify its contract award. Read more about contracting by negotiation. […]
[…] This government contract was to be awarded to the offeror that provided the best value to the government, utilizing tradeoff source selection procedures as provided in FAR 15.101-1. AR 1:182. The solicitation also stated that the government would make an award to the “responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other non-price factors considered.” AR 1:182. The solicitation also stated, “[b]ecause this procurement will use the tradeoff process as outlined in FAR 15.101–1, the Government may accept other than the lowest priced proposal as the overall best value procurement.” Read more about contracting by negotiation. […]
[…] GAO has previously ruled that when a solicitation anticipates the use of a best value evaluation plan–as opposed to selection based on lowest price and technical acceptability–evaluation of quotations is not limited to determining whether a quotation is merely technically acceptable. Rather, quotations should be further differentiated to distinguish their relative quality under each stated evaluation factor by considering the degree to which technically acceptable quotations exceed the stated minimum requirements or will better satisfy the agency’s needs. Read more about contracting by negotiation. […]
[…] price technically acceptable contract awards or best value evaluation mistakes by the agency in negotiated contracts. Government agencies are advertising many of the Requests for Solicitation under a Lowest […]
[…] Negotiated government contracts: When the government RFP evaluation is based on stated weighted factors in the solicitation, government contract pricing is taken more seriously by the agency. However, even in negotiated procurements, and despite lower-scored technical proposals, agencies still can go to a lower-priced bidder. The key is to read the RFP evaluation criteria. […]
[…] second is an Request for Proposal that is considered a contract by negotiation. Here, the Request for Proposal states certain price and non-price factors and the relevant weight […]
[…] response, the agency will first compare your proposal to the solicitation requirements. Then, in negotiated procurements, it will often decide the competitive range. Afterwards, each proposal within the competitive range […]
[…] bid submission, when the Agency engages in contracting by negotiation clarifications, they must follow the plain meaning of the FAR Part […]
Comments are closed.